During the first game of the Women’s Premier League (WPL), a unique incident occurred that drew attention to the tournament’s regulations. Mumbai Indians (MI) were bowling when the standing umpire made a wide call against them, awarding an extra run to Gujarat Giants (GT).
However, MI skipper Harmanpreet Kaur challenged the decision through the Decision Review System (DRS) and the review proved that the call was incorrect as the ball had actually hit the glove of the GT batter, Monica Patel. The umpire’s decision was reversed, and MI finished the over with a dot ball.
This incident raised questions about the WPL’s DRS regulations, which allow teams to refer wide or no-ball calls made against them in addition to dismissal decisions.
According to law 3.1.1 of the WPL playing regulations, a player review may be requested for any decision taken by the on-field umpires concerning whether or not a batter is dismissed, except for ‘Timed Out’. Additionally, teams can also review any decision made by the umpires regarding wide or no-ball calls.
The WPL officials’ open-minded approach to DRS regulations is commendable as it gives teams the opportunity to save runs through reviews, which can often make a significant difference in T20 cricket matches.
